USPTO serial 78346276
TI TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TI TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
60044 FABRIANO (ANCONA), IT
60044 FABRIANO (ANCONA), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R. VIGIL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | CENTRAL HEATING BOILERS FOR PRODUCING WARM WATER, HOT WATER, AND STEAM; WATER BATH HEATERS, HOT WATER HEATERS, ELECTRIC WATER HEATERS, BOILERS, ELECTRIC BOILERS, ELECTRIC RADIATORS, ELECTRIC FANS, HOT WATER TANKS; GAS-FIRED CENTRAL HEATING UNITS; SHOWER-BATHS, ELECTRIC SHOWER-BATHS, BATH TUBS; HEAT REGENERATORS AND HEATING PLATES; SHOWER BASES AND SHOWER ENCLOSURES, NAMELY, CUBICLES AND SHOWER BOXES; SANITARY WARES, NAMELY TOILET AND TOILET BOWLS, TOILET TANKS, SINKS AND URINALS; AIR CONDITIONING APPARATUS, NAMELY, AIR CONDITIONING UNITS, AIR CONDITIONING APPARATUS FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES, CENTRAL AIR-CONDITIONING INSTALLATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES; CENTRAL HEATING PLANTS; AND, WATER DISTRIBUTION INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, FAUCETS, SINKS, BATH TUBS, SHOWERS, SAUNAS, HEAT PUMPS AND WHIRLPOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |