USPTO serial 78348323
POSATEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSATEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
SUMMIT, NJ
Other trademarks owned by SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
Summit, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
Reno, NV
Other trademarks owned by Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sophie B. Anger or Nancy L. Rowe
SOPHIE B ANGER OR NANCY L ROWE SCHERING CORPORATION2000 GALLOPING HILL RDKENILWORTH, NJ 07033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dermatological preparations for veterinary use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Schering-Plough Veterinary Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named POSATEX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 17, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |