USPTO serial 78349223
LOGISTICARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LOGISTICARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John B. Farmer
Amy S. Ashworth Leading-Edge Law Group, PLC1051 East Cary StreetSuite 1130Richmond, VA 23219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for use in logistics management, namely, computer software for tracking and managing logistics for the provision of services, and business management software for logistics management of other businesses; software for use in transportation management to enable real-time routing, dispatching, tracking, management and control of transportation requests and resources-- (1) to allow for handling reservation requests for services, (2) to enable billing, payment and auditing of services, (3) to verify compliance of third-party vendors and quality assurance of services, and (4) for creating or assigning routes and schedules for services including transportation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use in logistics management, namely, computer software for tracking and managing logistics for the provision of services, and business management software for logistics management of other businesses; software for use in transportation management to enable real-time routing, dispatching, tracking, management and control of transportation requests and resources-- (1) to allow for handling reservation requests for services, (2) to enable billing, payment and auditing of services, (3) to verify compliance of third-party vendors and quality assurance of services, and (4) for creating or assigning routes and schedules for services including transportation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gainesville Technology Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PROVADO TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROVADO TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LOGISTICARE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |