USPTO serial 78349842
HAR LAM KEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 20, 2005
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HAR LAM KEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Monterey Park, CA
Monterey Park, CA
Monterey Park, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria K. Mak
MARIA K MAK ESQ WONG & MAK LLP790 E COLORADO BLVD STE 790PASADENA, CA 91101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |