USPTO serial 78349881
BARIONET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BARIONET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary J. Pitzer
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [Based on 1(a) and 44(e)] Electric and electronic devices and instruments for information processing, data collection and transmission, in particular data collection terminals and communication devices for networks; computer programs for controlling and viewing the operation of input/output modules, for displaying operational parameters relating to the operational status of equipment and processes, and for receiving and transmitting data and commands via a communications network recorded on data media; devices and instruments for measuring, signaling and monitoring electricity and optics; devices for recording, transmitting and reproducing sound and images, namely, electronic computer hardware, computer peripherals, and computer network interface devices; devices and instruments for conducting, distributing, transforming, storing, regulating and controlling electricity, namely, power supplies and power converters; pre-recorded magnetic recording media containing reference manuals and product information; alarm devices, namely, security alarms and installations, namely, input/output modules, sensors as well as their parts; electronic time switches, electric switches, electric door closers, electrical monitoring devices for monitoring environmental and electrical conditions | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 2003 |
| 042 | [Based on 44(e)] Development, design and maintenance of computer programs for data collection and data transmission; industrial research for data collection and data transmission, as well as consulting for this purpose | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2006 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |