USPTO serial 78349942
KAMI-ROBO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAMI-ROBO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
John E. Lyhus Fitch Even Tabin & FlannerySuite 1600120 South LaSalle StreetChicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO GAMES, NAMELY, VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE; COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; DISCS, NAMELY DISCS THAT CONTAIN SOFTWARE FOR VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS, FOR ARCADE VIDEO GAMES, FOR HAND-HELD GAMES WITH LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS, AND FOR COMPUTER GAME; AUDIO DISCS ON THE SUBJECT OF MAINLY ANIMATION, LIVE-ACTION, ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SUBJECTS; CD-ROMS AND CASSETTES NAMELY, CD-ROMS AND CASSETTES THAT CONTAIN SOFTWARE FOR VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS, FOR ARCADE VIDEO GAMES, FOR HAND-HELD GAMES WITH LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAYS, AND FOR COMPUTER GAMES; PRERECORDED AUDIO CASSETTES ON THE SUBJECT OF MAINLY ANIMATION, LIVE-ACTION, ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SUBJECTS; ELECTRONIC GAME DEVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS THAT CONTAIN SOFTWARE FOR VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS, ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS FOR USE IN AMUSEMENT GAME MACHINES; ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS NAMELY, BOOK, MAGAZINE, COMIC BOOKS AND STRIPS, PHOTOGRAPH AND NEWSPAPER FEATURING MAINLY ANIMATION, LIVE-ACTION, FASHION, ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL SUBJECTS RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PHOTOGRAPH MOUNTS; PASTES AND ADHESIVES FOR STATIONERY OR HOUSEHOLD PURPOSES; ELECTRIC PENCIL SHARPENERS; PAPER DIAPERS; INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING CONTAINERS OF PAPER; FOOD WRAPPING PLASTIC FILMS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE; TAILORS' CHALK; HYGIENIC PAPER; PAPER TOWELS; PAPER NAPKINS; PAPER HAND TOWELS; HANDKERCHIEFS OF PAPER TISSUE; PAPER TABLE CLOTHS; PAPER AND CARDBOARD; STATIONERY; PAINTINGS; PHOTOGRAPH STANDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, JACKETS, SWEAT PANTS, SKIRTS, TROUSERS, COATS, SWEATERS, VESTS AND WAISTCOATS, NIGHT WEAR, UNDERWEAR, SWIM WEAR, SWIMMING CAPS, JAPANESE TRADITIONAL CLOTHING, NAMELY, SASH BANDS FOR KIMONO, BUSTLE HOLDER BANDS FOR OBI, BUSTLES FOR OBI-KNOTS, WAIST STRINGS FOR KIMONOS, UNDERSHIRTS FOR KIMONOS, TIGHTENING-UP STRINGS FOR KIMONOS, WRAP BELTS FOR KIMONOS, FULL-LENGTH KIMONOS, SHORT OVERCOAT FOR KIMONO, STRINGS FASTENERS FOR HAORI, PLEATED SKIRTS FOR FORMAL KIMONOS, DETACHABLE NECKPIECES FOR KIMONOS; APRONS, COLLAR PROTECTORS, SOCKS AND STOCKINGS, PUTTEES AND GAITERS, FUR STOLES, SHAWLS, SCARVES, GLOVES AND MITTENS, TEXTILE DIAPERS, NECKTIES, NECKERCHIEVES, BANDANAS, WARMTH-KEEPING SUPPORTERS, NAMELY, LEG WARMERS, MUFFLERS, EAR MUFFS, HOODS, NIGHTCAPS, HEADWEAR; SUSPENDERS; FOOTWEAR; CLOTHES FOR SPORTS, NAMELY, SHIRTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | ARCADE VIDEO GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Butterfly Stroke Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Butterfly Stroke Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named KAMI-ROBO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |