USPTO serial 78350076
BOBBI BROWN BEACH SANDBAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3545014Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 9, 2008
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BOBBI BROWN BEACH SANDBAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lesley A. Moradian
Lesley A. Moradian THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES42nd Floor767 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10153Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated toiletries and skin care preparations, namely, scented exfoliator | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Bobbi Brown Professional Cosmetics Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BOBBI BROWN BEACH SANDBAR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |