USPTO serial 78350147
SOCKET SAVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2006
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SOCKET SAVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SALINAS, CA
Henderson, NV
Henderson, NV
Henderson, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel M. Cislo, Esq.
Daniel M. Cislo, Esq. CISLO & THOMAS LLP12100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1700Los Angeles, CA 90025-7103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Devices for repairing, adapting, or retrofitting electrical systems, namely socket adapters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CRUZ, CARLOS
- Other trademarks owned by SOCKET SAVER, CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOCKET SAVER, CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SOCKET SAVER, CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SOCKET SAVER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |