Drawing for E-VILLE.

USPTO serial 78350288

E-VILLE.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-VILLE.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

JASON M DRANGEL EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES LLP60 E 42ND ST STE 820NEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Motion picture films in the fields of live action, animation, comedy and dramaACTIVE—
041Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the fields of live action, animation, comedy and dramaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 19, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 19, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 8, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 15, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 7, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 5, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 5, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 11, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 2, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance