USPTO serial 78350396
A CONSTRUCTION LAW FIRM THAT KNOWS CONSTRUCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2962669Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 14, 2005
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with A CONSTRUCTION LAW FIRM THAT KNOWS CONSTRUCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | [Building construction and repair] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2004 |
| 041 | Provide construction education classes, workshops, and speaking engagements in the filed of building construction; See website rackaspatelaw;com for additional descriptions of construction education services provided | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2004 |
| 042 | Provide legal services in transactional aspects of construction law-- contracts, negotiations, dispute resolution; See website rackaspatelaw;com for additional description of construction legal services provided | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 20, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pate, Ann Rackas
- Other trademarks owned by Pate, Ann Rackas
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named A CONSTRUCTION LAW FIRM THAT KNOWS CONSTRUCTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 21, 2011 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |