USPTO serial 78350847
SLOT SURVIVOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SLOT SURVIVOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians
Lakeside, CA
Other trademarks owned by Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians
Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians
Lakeside, CA
Other trademarks owned by Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert K. Edmunds
ROBERT K EDMUNDS ALHADEFF & SOLAR LLP707 BROADWAY STE 800SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-5836UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment in the nature of a casino slot machine tournament | ABANDONED | Nov 21, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians
- Other trademarks owned by Barona Group of the Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SLOT SURVIVOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |