USPTO serial 78351604
KITCHEN LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KITCHEN LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANDIA PARK, NM
SANDIA PARK, NM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janeen Vilven
Janeen Vilven PEACOCK MYERS, P.C.P.O. Box 26927ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87125-6927UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Kitchen utensils, namely, kitchen tongs, jar openers, meat tenderizers, ice cream scoops, ice cream spades, bottle openers, garlic presses, graters, cork screws, spoon rests, scoops, colanders, strainers, mincers, pastry and basting brushes, pastry crimpers, whisks, manual dough blenders, spatulas, pots and pan scrapers, rolling pins; barbecue utensils, namely, spatulas, cooking and corn skewers, grill brushes, grid grill toppers, wok toppers, grill baskets, and fish turners; kitchen soap dishes; kitchen soap dispensers; dish drying racks; kitchen sink cooking strainers; kitchen care brush sets composed of sink brushes, fruit and vegetable brushes and dish brushes; kitchen sponge and kitchen brush organizers; containers for non-electric kitchen utensils; paper towel holders; bread boxes; canister sets; spice racks; napkin holders; counter stand for non-electric kitchen utensils, not of precious metal; recipe boxes, cruets, not of precious metal; coolers for wines; pitchers; ice buckets; mixing bowls; salad spinners; bed trays, not of precious metal for serving food; non-electric juicers; flour sifters; cookie stamps; cookie cutters; cookie presses; pepper mills; pepper shakers; salt mills; salt shakers; cake decorating sets consisting of cake and pastry decorating tops and pastry bags; plastic coasters; cookery molds; fat separators for separating fat from gravy; melon ballers; cutting boards; trivets; potato ricers; potato mashers; non-electric cooking oil spray bottles, sold empty; cheese boards; barbecue serving trays, not made of precious metal; non-electric food mills for mincing, grinding, grating and milling; egg separators; cooking pan splatter screens; barware and wine accessories, namely, wine bottle foil removers, wine bottle pouring spouts, charms for attachment to wine glasses for identification purposes and drip-preventing wine bottle neck collars, not of precious metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |