Drawing for CANWICH

USPTO serial 78352030

CANWICH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CANWICH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie K. Morriss

JULIE K MORRISS MORRISS O'BRYANT COMPAGNI PCSTE 700 136 S MAIN STSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Food items packaged in cans, namely meat-based sandwichesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2006MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 14, 2006ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 14, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 14, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Mar 1, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 11, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance