Drawing for CARB CONSCIOUS

USPTO serial 78352243

CARB CONSCIOUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARB CONSCIOUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen B. Salai

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen entrees consisting primarily of vegetables with meat or fish or poultry, frozen meals consisting of meat, fish or poultry with vegetables in various proportionsACTIVE—
031raw vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 28, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 28, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 2, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 2, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 21, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance