USPTO serial 78352474
BALL PARK BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3402893Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 2008
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BALL PARK BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Winston-Salem, NC
Winston-Salem, NC
BLUE ASH, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret Murray
Mary Margaret Murray The Hillshire Brands Company400 South Jefferson StreetChicago, IL 60607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sandwiches and hot dogs on a bun or wrapped in dough | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SARA LEE FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Sara Lee Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Sara Lee Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by SARA LEE FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BALL PARK BRAND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |