USPTO serial 78352988
ANGELATO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3532369Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 11, 2008
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ANGELATO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Prosperity Development Corporation
Blaine, WA
Other trademarks owned by Prosperity Development Corporation
Prosperity Development Corporation
Blaine, WA
Other trademarks owned by Prosperity Development Corporation
Prosperity Development Corporation
Blaine, WA
Other trademarks owned by Prosperity Development Corporation
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph F. Hart
Joseph F. Hart Law Offices of Joseph F. Hart800 S. Robertson Blvd.Suite 3Los Angeles, CA 90035-1634Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Ice cream and products made from ice cream, namely, ice cream (called Gelato) sandwiches, ice cream cakes, ice cream bars, afogato sundaes (ice cream with a shot of espresso) and ice cream novelties (ice cream in shapes of fruits, flowers, and animals) | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Prosperity Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Prosperity Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Prosperity Development Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named ANGELATO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |