USPTO serial 78353063
SCIENTIFIC FRONTIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCIENTIFIC FRONTIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic goods in the nature of equipment that ranges in size from nonotechnology to arbitrary large equipment wherein the equipment as applied to military, medical, industrial and commercial products incorporates one or more of the following items of appropriate size and function: imaging instruments, measuring instruments, constructing instruments, cutting instruments, robotic instruments, computers, software, real time central systems, communications, navigation, flight control, motion control, weapons, power source, propulsion source, user interface, system management, electrical, mechanical, electronic, photonic, elements, chemicals, materials, land vehicles, water vessels, aircraft, spacecraft, satellites, space stations, space power, space instruments, energy projection instruments, and energy detection instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |