Drawing for ENABLING MANUFACTURABLE DESIGN

USPTO serial 78353242

ENABLING MANUFACTURABLE DESIGN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BRIAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENABLING MANUFACTURABLE DESIGN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paula D. Heyman; JERRY W. MILLS, KEVIN J. MEEK, THOMAS R. FELGER, PAULA D. HEYMAN

PAULA D HEYMAN BAKER BOTTS LLP1500 SAN JACINTO CTR98 SAN JACINTO BLVDAUSTIN, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for semiconductor designACTIVENov 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 12, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 12, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 9, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 11, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance