USPTO serial 78353257
MIMOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YAO, GRETTA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIMOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kent D. Baker, Esq.
KENT D. BAKER, ESQ. QUALCOMM INCORPORATEDPATENT & TRADEMARK DEPT. 5775 MOREHOUSE DRIVESAN DIEGO, CA 92121-1714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and hardware for configuring communication systems or parts of communications systems using multiple inputs and/or multiple outputs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 11, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |