USPTO serial 78353454
THE BEAUTY SHOP CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BEAUTY SHOP CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ray Perez
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services, internet and mail-order catalog services for cosmetics, toiletries, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, bath and body preparations, and nail polish and related products; rendering technical aid and assistance in the establishment of business and retail stores selling cosmetics, toiletries, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, bath and body preparations, and nail polish and related products; preparing advertising and promotional materials for franchisees. | ACTIVE | Feb 19, 2003 |
| 042 | Retail store services, internet and mail-order catalog services for cosmetics, toiletries, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, bath and body preparations, and nail polish and related products; rendering technical aid and assistance in the establishment of business and retail stores selling cosmetics, toiletries, skin care preparations, hair care preparations, bath and body preparations, and nail polish and related products; preparing advertising and promotional materials for franchisees | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Feb 19, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |