USPTO serial 78353762
DENTALMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DENTALMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Nefsky, Esq.
ROBERT L NEFSKY ESQ REMBOLT LUDTKE & BERGER LLP1201 LINCOLN MALL, STE 102LINCOLN, NE 68508UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for personal computers for maintaining patient records and billing in the field of practice management for health professionals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |