Drawing for ESSENTIAL TO PRINT

USPTO serial 78354052

ESSENTIAL TO PRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESSENTIAL TO PRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller and Amanda Laura Nye

Susan L. Heller and Amanda Laura Nye Greenberg Traurig, LLP2450 Colorado Avenue, Suite 400ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Maintenance and installation of computer hardware; information consultancy and advisory services relating to the aforesaidACTIVE—
040Printing services; information consultancy and advisory services relating to the aforesaid does not include providing printing services for payACTIVE—
041electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on CD, DVD, and on-line featuring the following: sales, marketing and technical support for printers, copiers, multifunction devices and mobile communication devices and digital imaging and print management solutions for professional and enterprise printing; document management tools, including production workflow print management information and software solutions, proofing software and enterprise and mobile printing solutions, for stand-alone servers connected to digital copiers and other peripheral devices and controllers embedded in digital copiers and other peripheral devices and controllers embedded in digital copiers and desktop color laser printers; the aforesaid does not include providing printing services for payACTIVE—
042Technical support, namely, providing assistance in the use and operation of printers, copiers, multifunction devices and mobile communication devices and digital imaging and print management solutions for professional and enterprise printing, document management tools from creation to print, including production workflow, print management information software solutions, proofing software and enterprise and mobile printing solutions, including stand-alone servers connected to digital copiers and other peripheral devices and controllers embedded in digital copiers and desktop color laser printers; computer aided engineering design and drawing services for others; computer programming for others; computer systems analysis; research in the field of computer hardware and software; development of computer hardware and software; computer software design for others; website hosting services for others; hosted internet sites for others which allow businesses or individuals to submit printing jobs to printing companies for production; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software; information consultancy and advisory services relating to the aforesaidACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 3, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 12, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 12, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance