USPTO serial 78354067
ATOMIC ENERGY DRINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ATOMIC ENERGY DRINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Richardson
DAVID RICHARDSON NERY & MURIEL LLC4124 W 63RD STCHICAGO, IL 60629UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Flavored Energy Drink containing vitamins and minerals | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |