USPTO serial 78354098
SIMPLYCLICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIMPLYCLICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
STEPHEN L BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software in the field of education, namely platform software for computer hardware and platform software for communications networks to be used in schools, and software that enables consumers to access the communication platform and supports the communication platform | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising; compilation of advertisements for use of web pages on the Internet; compilation directories for publishing on the Internet; provision of space on websites for advertising goods and services; providing an on-line, interactive bulletin board for the posting, promotion, sale and resale of items via a global computer network; providing an on-line, interactive bulletin board for the collection and dissemination of statistical, quantitive and qualitative information regarding the sale and resale of items via a global computer network; on-line advisory and information services relating to the sale of professional products; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods and services, enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from an Internet website; business administration services for the processing of sales made on the Internet; business information services provided on-line from a computer database or the Internet; auctioneering services. | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication of information (including web pages), computer programs and any other data; providing user access to the Internet; providing user access to the Internet, extranets and intranets; providing user access to specially developed communication platforms, protected by secure log-ins, on the Internet, extranets and intranets; telecommunications gateway services; provision of access to on-line commercial market places for conducting e-commerce; ISP services. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creating and maintaining websites; hosting the websites of others; creating and maintaining and on-line commercial market place for conducting e-commerce; Internet content subscription services; providing subscription access to platforms for communication on the Internet, extranets and intranets. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Entire Consultancy Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SIMPLYCLICK
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |