USPTO serial 78354130
EMSCREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMSCREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph F. Schmidt
Joseph F. Schmidt Welsh & Katz, Ltd.22nd Floor120 South Riverside PlazaChicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal building materials, namely, electroless copper plated non-woven sheet material, and metal mesh sheet, all having shielding material against electromagnetic radiation for covering walls, floors and ceilings for shielding rooms against electromagnetic radiation; false floor systems, namely, copper sheeting material having embedded shielding material against electromagnetic radiation; suspended ceiling systems, namely, stainless steel sheeting material having embedded shielding material against electromagnetic radiation for shielding rooms from electromagnetic radiation | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, wall and ceiling panels, window frames and doors, and sheets of textile fabric for covering walls, ceilings and floors before installation of decorative coverings, all having embedded shielding material against electromagnetic radiation for shielding rooms from electromagnetic radiation; non-metallic transportable buildings | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technology consultation in the field of architectural electromagnetic shielding systems; industrial design; measuring of radiation intensity; design for others in the field of radiation protection concepts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EMV Elektronische Meßgeräte Vertriebs GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EMSCREEN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |