Drawing for SENSER

USPTO serial 78354281

SENSER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENSER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas D. Bratschun

Thomas D. Bratschun Swanson & Bratschun, L.L.C.8210 Southpark TerraceLittleton, CO 80120UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation and maintenance of instrumentation for reading encoded nanoparticulate identification tags; installing encoded nanoparticulate identification tags for authentication of objectsACTIVE—
045Authentication of objects by identifying and reading encoded nanoparticulate identification tagsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 20, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 2, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 23, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 24, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 17, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance