Drawing for KINDER PARTY

USPTO serial 78354390

KINDER PARTY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KINDER PARTY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ursula B. Day

Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SOAPS; PERFUMERY; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR USE IN THE PRODUCTION OF PERFUMES; COLOGNES AND SCENTED SOAPS, COSMETICS, HAIR LOTIONS, DENTIFRICESABANDONED—
028GAMES NAMELY, BOARD GAMES; PLAYTHINGS NAMELY DOLLS, TOY ACTION FIGURES, CARD GAMES; PARLOR GAMES, INFLATABLE TOYS, JUMP ROPES, KITES, SAND TOYS, BOXES FOR HOLDING COLLECTIONS OF THEMED TOY FIGURES, SAID BOXES ALSO BEING USED FOR PLAYING WITH FIGURES, TOY BUILDING BLOCKS, TOY TRAINS; GYMNASTIC AND SPORTING ARTICLES NAMELY, GYMNASTIC APPARATUS, SPORTS BALLS, EXERCISE MACHINES; CHRISTMAS TREE DECORATIONSABANDONED—
029MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; MILK; JELLIES, JAMS, SAUCES, NAMELY CRANBERRY AND APPLE SAUCE; EGGS; EDIBLE OILS AND FATSABANDONED—
030COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; FLOUR, PROCESSED CEREALS, BREAD, PASTRY AND CONFECTIONERY NAMELY, CONFECTIONERY CHIPS FOR BAKING, CRYSTAL SUGAR PIECES, FRUIT JELLIES, FLAVORED ICES; HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST, BAKING-POWDER; SALT, MUSTARD; VINEGAR, SAUCES, ICE MILK, ICE MILK BARS; CONDIMENTS NAMELY, MUSTARD, KETCHUP, COOKING SALT, PEPPER, RELISH, BARBECUE SAUCE; SPICES; COOLING ICE; AND MILK PRODUCTS NAMELY MILK SHAKES AND BASES FOR MAKING MILK SHAKESABANDONED—
032BEERS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS AND SOFT DRINKS FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; CONCENTRATES, SYRUPS OR POWDERS USED IN THE PREPARATION OF SOFT DRINKSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 21, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 21, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 28, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 22, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2006PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION—
Jun 28, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance