Drawing for TITLE COMPANY OF DENVER

USPTO serial 78354794

TITLE COMPANY OF DENVER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TITLE COMPANY OF DENVER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald M. Rubin

Ronald M. Rubin RUBIN & ZIMMERMAN, P.C.9725 E. Hampden, Suite 330Denver, CO 80231UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042title searching and real estate closing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 27, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 27, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 30, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 10, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 19, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance