USPTO serial 78354889
WACKED GAMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WACKED GAMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Braverman, Esq.
Todd Braverman, Esq. Bryan Cave LLP1290 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing, namely jeans, sweatpants, shirts, pants, sweaters, shoes, underwear, sleepwear, belts, gloves, scarves, socks and jackets | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs featuring video games and video game players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Business Team, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Independent Business Team, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by THUMB WORLD PRODUCTIONS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WACKED GAMER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |