Drawing for INFO-TEK

USPTO serial 78355528

INFO-TEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, LATONIA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFO-TEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tawnya R. Wojciechowski

TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI TRW LAW GROUP19900 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 1150IRVINE, CA 92612-8433UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video monitors, liquid crystal displays, plasma display monitors and plasma display televisions, computer software comprised of operating system programs, basic input-output system programs to facilitate the transfer of date and control instructions between the computer peripherals, blank compact discs, CDs featuring music, CDs featuring computer game software; blank DVDs, prerecorded DVDs featuring music and documentaries; color laser printers, scanners, digital cameras, digital cellular phones, private automatic branch exchanges, modems, switch boxes, computers, compact discs containing documentaries and video games, compact disc players, computer keyboards, computer mice, computer trackball mice, computer interface boards, blank floppy discs for computers, floppy discs featuring music and computer video games, calculators, digital videodisc drives, printed circuit boards, hard disc drives, video game machines for use with televisions, video tape recorders, videocassette recorders, audio tape recorders, digital audio tape recorders, magnetic pens, styluses, facsimile machines, telephones, telephone apparatus, namely, intercoms, cordless telephones, radio pagers, semiconductors, fly back transformer, bar code readers, optical character recognition readers, and personal digital assistantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 18, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 18, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 18, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 17, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance