Drawing for MONSTER MILLIONS

USPTO serial 78355954

MONSTER MILLIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER MILLIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sana Hakim, Esq.

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming machines, namely, slot machines with or without video output, video lottery terminals, or gaming machines for play of an interactive, electronic, Class II bingo gameACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 9, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 8, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 29, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 12, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance