USPTO serial 78356637
WE MAKE IT HAPPEN.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WE MAKE IT HAPPEN.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Marr
MARK E WIEMELT LAW OFFICES OF MARK E WIEMELT PC10 S LASALLE ST STE 3300CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ADVERTISING SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE NATURE OF DEVELOPING BRAND IDENTITY | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2003 |
| 042 | RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN FOR NEW PRODUCTS OR BRANDS FOR OTHERS; GRAPHIC ART AND ILLUSTRATION DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS; GRAPHIC ART PRODUCTION AND GRAPHIC ART DESIGN SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF BRAND IDENTITY, BRAND DESIGN, PACKAGING DESIGN, PRODUCT DESIGN AND PROVIDING PRODUCT PACKAGING SOLUTIONS THROUGH DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION, COLOR EXPLORATION, MODEL MAKING AND PROTOTYPING | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |