Drawing for ELASTOCRETE

USPTO serial 78356695

ELASTOCRETE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELASTOCRETE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott F. Landis

SCOTT F LANDIS BARLEY SNYDER126 E KING ST PO BOX 1559LANCASTER, PA 17608-1559UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Resilient urethane and rubber surface used for gymnasium flooring and indoor multi-purpose areasACTIVENov 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 16, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 16, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 5, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance