USPTO serial 78357196
DR. SMITH'S RASH 'N ALL OINTMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3177738Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DR. SMITH'S RASH 'N ALL OINTMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN ANTONIO, TX
SAN ANTONIO, TX
SAN ANTONIO, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter E. Graves
PETER E GRAVES3720 ROCKY FORD DRAUSTIN, TX 78749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical ointment used for the prevention and treatment of rash | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |