USPTO serial 78357266
BENCHMARK POLLING GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2005
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BENCHMARK POLLING GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Miranda, Esq.
David P. Miranda, Esq. HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI, P.C.5 COLUMBIA CIRCLEALBANY, NY 12203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Public opinion polling services; market research and public opinion research services; compilation and analyses of marketing and public opinion data | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Aug 18, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | โ |
| Aug 18, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 18, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jul 23, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 16, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Nov 8, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 9, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jun 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Feb 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Feb 15, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 21, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |