USPTO serial 78357297
RED TEAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED TEAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Providing security services by means application of knowledge of a potential adversary's strategic goals, objectives, motivations, organization, targeting, tactics,techniques, procedures, and equipment, and is comprised of individuals with unique training, expertise, experience, and analytical capabilities and improves an entity's ability to detect, deter, preempt, respond, defend, defeat, and or mitigate the effects of a security threat or attack; provide vulnerability and threat assessments, adversary profiling, and quantitative risk mitigation strategies; provide physical and cyber surveillance, targeting, attack planning, and penetration assessments; provide an adversary's perspective and serve as a devil's advocate; develop reality-based scenarios, threat projections, and trend analyses; provide surrogate adversaries for exercises to stress response capabilities; assess intelligence collection, sharing, analysis, and dissemination capabilities during exercises and events; identify and assess technologies exploitation by adversaries; provide advisory and administrative support to include Best Practices Analyses,Acquisition Strategies, Security Architecture Development, and Physical Security Integration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |