Drawing for ARIA

USPTO serial 78357374

ARIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AMOS, TANYA L
Law office
PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

OLGA M. NEDELTSCHEFF

ALISA D HURLBURT PHILIP MORRIS USA INC6601 W BROAD STRICHMOND, VA 23230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Aerosol generation equipment for medical use, namely soft mist aerosol generation equipment and capillary aerosol general equipment; Aerosol dispensers for medical use; Inhalers for medical use; Pulmonary drug delivery system for medical useABANDONEDAug 24, 2004
042Development of new technology for others in the medical and pharmaceutical fields, namely pulmonary drug delivery system, aerosol general equipment, soft mist aerosol generation equipment, and capillary aerosol general equipmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 12, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 12, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 31, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 31, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 31, 2004EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance