USPTO serial 78357395
FOAM ENTERPRISES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3267665Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2007
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FOAM ENTERPRISES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
FLORHAM PARK, NJ
Other trademarks owned by BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
FLORHAM PARK, NJ
Other trademarks owned by BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
FLORHAM PARK, NJ
Other trademarks owned by BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
Minneapolis, MN
MOUNT OLIVE, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce M. Ferraro
JOYCE M FERRARO FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Packing materials in the nature of polyurethane formulations in the nature of sprays, liquids, semi-rigid, films and sheets for use in building, construction and in the manufacture and repair of marine craft as a floatation sublayer; polyurethane foam insulation for use in building and construction; polyurethane formulations in the nature of spray foams, liquid foams, semi-rigid foams, semi-rigid foams and sheet foams for wall, ceiling, floor, and roof coverings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
| 037 | installation, maintenance, and repair of construction equipment for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
| 040 | Manufacture of construction equipment for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
| 041 | training services in the field of construction techniques | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
| 042 | Custom design of construction equipment for others; technical consultation in the field of construction techniques and construction equipment selection; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting construction equipment problems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1983 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BASF POLYURETHANE FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Foam Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FOAM ENTERPRISES LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FOAM ENTERPRISES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 8, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |