USPTO serial 78357648
INTELLIGENT ORTHOPAEDICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3534108Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 18, 2008
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTELLIGENT ORTHOPAEDICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Intelligent Orthopaedics Limited
Staffordshire, ST4 1ET, GB
Intelligent Orthopaedics Limited
Staffordshire, ST4 1ET, GB
Intelligent Orthopaedics Limited
Staffordshire, ST4 1ET, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Drangel
Jason M. Drangel Epstein Drangel LLP60 E 42nd Street, Suite 2410New York, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Orthopaedic medical devices, namely, external trauma bone fixation devices and orthopaedic fracture management devices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological research services and research and design relating to external bone fixation devices and orthopaedic fracture management devices; medical research and development of external bone fixation devices and orthopaedic fracture management devices, surgical instruments relating to external bone fixation devices and orthopaedic fracture management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Orthopaedics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Orthopaedics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Orthopaedics Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT ORTHOPAEDICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 18, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | CNSL | SU - SUSPENSION LETTER - WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |