USPTO serial 78357694
LLOYD'S COFFEE HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LLOYD'S COFFEE HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephan P. Gribok, Esquire
STEPHAN P GRIBOK/MAXIM A VOLTCHENKO DUANE MORRIS LLP30 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Coffee shop services, namely, serving high-end gourmet coffee, teas and other non-alcoholic beverages, doughnuts, pastries and other light snacks in an atmosphere of social and community exchange | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |