USPTO serial 78357954
FOLLE DE TOI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOLLE DE TOI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
BEVERLY HILLS, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | dress, skirt, blouse, shirt, t-shirt, pants, shorts, bra, panties, shawl, scarf, socks, stocking, hat, gloves, wedding-dress, evening-dress, vest, jacket, suit, tank-top, shoes, camisole, robe, coat, swimsuit, sweater, rain coat, legging, fur coat, fur shawl, fur collar, fur hat, fur vest, fur jacket, active wear, namely, Jogging pants, Ski pants, Snow pants, Sweat pants, Ski wear, Surf wear, Swim wear, Tennis wear, Jogging suits, Sweat bands, Sweat pants, Denim pants, Sweat shirts, Sweat shorts, Sweat suits, Camp shirts, Golf shirts, Polo shirts, Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts, Denim Shirts, Sport shirts, Wind shirts, Denim jackets, Sports jackets, Wind-jackets, Waterproof jackets and pants, Ski jackets, Bathing suits, Jogging suits, Gym suits, Play suits, Rain suits, Ski suits, Snow boarding suits, Training suits, Body suits, Sport coats, Riding coats, Trench coats, Wind coats, Sneakers, Ballet shoes, Apres-ski shoes, Athletic shoes, Baseball shoes, Beach shoes, Deck-shoes, Golf shoes, Heel pieces for shoes, Leather shoes, Rubber shoes, Tennis shoes, Gymnastic shoes, Training shoes, Ballet slippers, Ballet dresses, and dance leotards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ETE, THIERRY J
- Other trademarks owned by ETE, THIERRY J
- Other trademarks owned by ETE, SONIA M
- Other trademarks owned by ETE, THIERRY J
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FOLLE DE TOI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |