Drawing for SHEER INDULGENCE

USPTO serial 78357961

SHEER INDULGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHEER INDULGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald M. Kraai

GERALD M KRAAI LATHROP & GAGE LC2345 GRAND BLVD STE 2800KANSAS CITY, MO 64108-2684UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Wigs, hair pieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 20, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 20, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 20, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 6, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 25, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 25, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 20, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 20, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 31, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 31, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance