USPTO serial 78357976
PARTY ON FRIDAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARTY ON FRIDAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert D. Johnson, Esq.
ROBERT D JOHNSON ESQ JOHNSON & KLEVEN LLC50 S JONES BLVD STE 204LAS VEGAS, NV 89107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Applicant intends to provide entertainment and recreational services in conjunction with the mark, as well as services intended to amuse and engage the public; Applicant is an up-and-coming actress and dancer; her stage name is "Friday" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |