Drawing for SQUEEZE MEEZE

USPTO serial 78357980

SQUEEZE MEEZE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQUEEZE MEEZE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eugene L. Flanagan III

EUGENE L FLANAGAN III COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029YOGURTACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 16, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 5, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 5, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 6, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 6, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 5, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 9, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 1, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance