USPTO serial 78358132
FULL SERVICE - SMART SAVINGS!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULL SERVICE - SMART SAVINGS!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE J. BIELEN, JR.
THEODORE J BIELEN JR1390 WILLOW PASS RDSTE 1020CONCORD, CA 94520Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real Estate Brokerage | ABANDONED | Mar 21, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |