USPTO serial 78358248
CAREERS WITHOUT BORDERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAREERS WITHOUT BORDERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Francis J. Duffin
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Interactive job-matching services for employers or recruiters, and job seekers, provided electronically, via a web site and/or in-person, which permit job seekers to create and register profiles and curriculum viteas in a database, view international job openings and access career management techniques, and which provide employers or recruiters with job posting services, an individual or shared database of potential candidates for international job placements and additional in-person or electronic services in recruitment, deployment and human resources administration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |