USPTO serial 78358328
PLASTIC WELDING TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3118478Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PLASTIC WELDING TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant R. Clayton
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools and implements, namely, hand held air joiners in the nature of hot air and thermal wedge joiners for joining polycarbonate, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyphenylene, polystyrene, poly tetrafluoroethene and poly vinyl chloride membranes; extruders, namely, hand held extruders for use with polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyphenylene, polystyrene, poly tetra fluoroethene and polyvinyl chloride materials, namely, membranes, panels and sheets; and parts and accessories for all of the foregoing sold as a unit for use by construction and engineering professionals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Plastic Welding Technologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Plastic Welding Technologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named PLASTIC WELDING TECHNOLOGIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |