Drawing for PLASTIC WELDING TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78358331

PLASTIC WELDING TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3118479Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 18, 2006
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PLASTIC WELDING TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Grant R. Clayton

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical controllers for extruders and hot air joiners; electrical devices, namely, polymer electrodes for joining materials; temperature displays, namely, thermostat and electronic temperature displays, namely, temperature sensors for determining the operating temperature of extruders and hot air joiners; all of the forgoing for use by construction and engineering professionalsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 10, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 18, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 18, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 13, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 15, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 9, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 6, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance