USPTO serial 78358336
CLOSER GAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOSER GAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie Gruber
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cologne, eau de toilette, perfume, eau de parfum, face and body lotion, hand and body soap, body crème, body souffle, liquid hand soap, incense, potpourri, fragrance balm; make-up, blush, rouge, face powder, eye shadow, eye make-up, eyeliner, mascara, eyebrow pencil, nail polish, nail glitter, lip gloss, lipstick, lip liner, lip lacquer, lip balm, bubble bath, bath beads, bath bombs, bath and shower gel, bath salts, bath oil, bath powder, face and body scrub, facial mask, toner, astringent, body mist, body shimmer and glitter, shimmer powder, skin moisturizer, foot scrub, foot lotion, soap, aromatherapy lotions, arometherapy oils, suntan lotion, massage oil, shampoo, hair conditioner, essential oils for personal use, body oil, massage oil | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |