USPTO serial 78358626
SCOTBURSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCOTBURSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CALDERVALE FORGE COMPANY LIMITED
Airdrie, Lanarkshire, GB
CALDERVALE FORGE COMPANY LIMITED
Airdrie, Lanarkshire, GB
CALDERVALE FORGE COMPANY LIMITED
Airdrie, Lanarkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn S. Lederman
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PERCUSSIVE TOOLS, NAMELY DRILLING MACHINES, HYDRAULIC BREAKERS, REPLACEMENT IMPACT STEEL BITS FOR USE WITH DRILLING MACHINES AND HYDRAULIC BREAKERS, HYDRAULIC HAMMERS, HYDRAULIC CRUSHERS, MECHANICAL HAMMERS AND REPLACEABLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, NAMELY BREAKER BITS, CRADLES, PIPING AND HOSES; POWER OPERATED TOOLS, NAMELY DRILL HAMMERS AND ELECTRIC HAMMERS; AIR POWERED TOOLS, NAMELY PNEUMATIC HAMMERS; POWER-OPERATED DEMOLITION TOOLS, NAMELY CONCRETE BREAKERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CALDERVALE FORGE COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CALDERVALE FORGE COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CALDERVALE FORGE COMPANY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named SCOTBURSTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |